Appendix III. Table of Cases and Arbitral Awards

i Understanding the CISG (6th Ed.)
Gratis adgang

Appendix III. Table of Cases and Arbitral Awards

Argentina

Cámara Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Comercial de Buenos Aires, 24 April 2000, §2.11 n. 248.

Cámara Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Comercial de Buenos Aires, 7 October 2010, §2.4 n. 25.

Australia

Castel Electronics Pty. Ltd. v. Toshiba Singapore Pte. Ltd., §2.5 n. 49; §4.8 n. 117.

Downs Investments Pty Ltd. v. Perwaja Steel SDN BHD, §4.13 n. 231; §6.23 n. 351.

Hannaford v. Australian Farmlink Pty Ltd, §8.5 n. 29.

Roder Zeltund Hallenkonstruktionen GmbH v. Rosedown Park Pty Ltd, §2.6 n. 101.

Austria

Oberster Gerichtshof, 10 November 1994, §3.2 n. 22; §3.3 n. 36.

Oberster Gerichtshof, 6 February 1996, §4.11 n. 202.

Oberster Gerichtshof, 11 February 1997, §2.5 n. 40.

Oberster Gerichtshof, 8 September 1997, §2.5 n. 257.

Oberster Gerichtshof, 12 February 1998, §6.26 n. 372.

Oberster Gerichtshof, 15 October 1998, §4.9 n. 139 and n. 149.

Oberster Gerichtshof, 27 August 1999, §4.9 n. 149.

Side 243

Oberster Gerichtshof, 13 April 2000, §4.7 n. 94.

Oberster Gerichtshof, 28 April 2000, §6.28 n. 375.

Oberster Gerichtshof, 7 September 2000, §7.4 n. 75 and 76.

Oberster Gerichtshof, 27 February 2003, §4.7 n. 94.

Oberster Gerichtshof, 21 June 2005, §2.5 n. 63.

Oberster Gerichtshof, 2 April 2009, §2.7 n. 115.

Oberster Gerichtshof, 22 November 2011, §6.9 n. 119.

Oberster Gerichtshof, 15 November 2012, §6.8 n. 77.

Oberster Gerichtshof, 13 December 2012, §3.7 n. 75.

Oberster Gerichtshof, 15 January 2013, §6.15 n. 199.

Oberster Gerichtshof, 29 June 2017, §3.8 n. 88 and 94.

Oberlandesgericht Graz, 7 March 2002, §3.8 n. 98.

Obeerlandesgericht Graz, 9 November 1995, §4.4 n. 41; §6.13 n. 160.

Internationales Schiedsgericht der Bundeskammer der gewerblichen Wirtschaft – Wien, awards no. SCH-4318 and SCH-4366 of 15 June 1994, §2.10 n. 245; §2.11 n. 217; §6.18 n. 255; §6.31 n. 412.

Schiedsgericht der Börse für Landwirtschaftliche Produkte – Wien, 10 December 1997, §6.11 n. 147.

Belarus

International Court of Arbitration at Belarusian Chamber of Commerce, 5 January 2016, §6.26 n. 375.

Belgium

Hof van Beroep, Antwerp, 24 April 2006, §4.14 n. 246; §6.16 n. 232; §6.30 n. 406.

Hof van Beroep, Gent, 28 April 2000, §6.26, n. 375. Hof van Cassatie, 19 June 2009, §6.19 n. 302.

Rechtbank van Koophandel, Hasselt, 1 March 1995, §6.26 n. 373. Rechtbank van Koophandel, Hasselt, 2 May 1995, §6.32 n. 422.

Canada

Coutinho & Ferrostaal GmbH v. Tracomex Ltd., §2.6 n. 101.

La San Giuseppe v. Forti Moulding Ltd., §4.9 n. 133.

Mazzetta Company, l.l.c. v. Dégust-Mer Inc., §1.4 n. 56; §4.12 n. 219.

Side 244

Média Graph Dépôt Inc. v. MTEX Solutions S.A., §2.4 n. 26.

China

China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission, 7 January 2000, §2.12 n. 281.

China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission, 17 September 2003, §3.8 n. 101.

China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission, 24 July 2007, §6.6 n. 44.

China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission, 9 January 2008, §2.7 n. 130.

China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission, 18 April 2008, §2.5 n. 76.

Shenzhen Municipal Intermediate People’s Court, 30 March 2009, §8.5 n. 28.

Zheniang Provincial High People’s Court, 15 December 2010, §8.5 n. 28.

Czech Republic

Supreme Court, 29 January 2019, §2.11 n. 234.

Supreme Court, 17 December 2013, §2.11 n. 223; §3.11 n. 151.

Denmark

Ad Hoc Arbitral Tribunal, 10 November 2000, §6.8 n. 141.

Supreme Court, 15 February 2001, §4.2 n. 9; §4.3 n. 19; §5.2 n. 26.

Supreme Court, 17 October 2007, §6.18 n. 265, §6.27 n. 337; §6.29 n. 377.

Eastern High Court of Appeal, 23 April 1998, §3.7 n. 67.

Eastern High Court of Appeal, 27 June 2018, §2.12 n. 270 and n. 274.

Western High Court of Appeal, 10 November 1999, §4.9 n. 141; §6.8 n. 86 and n. 111; §6.13 n. 160.

Western High Court of Appeal, 8 November 2017, §1.4 n. 63; §4.12 n. 220.

Maritime and Commercial Court, 15 September 2015, §8.4 n. 25.

District Court Horsens, 7 December 2012, §4.8 n. 117.

District Court Randers, 8 July 2004, §5.5 n. 41.

England (& United Kingdom)

Chartbrook Limited v. Persimmon Homes Limited and others, §4.5 n. 47.

George Mitchell v. Finney Lock Seeds, §7.3 n. 35.

Side 245

Gill v. Duffus S.A. v. Société pour L’exportation des Sucres S.A., §6.8 n. 81.

Hadley v. Baxendale, §6.15 n. 188 and n. 228.

R.W. Green Ltd. v. Cade Bros. Farm, §7.3 n. 35.

European Court of Justice

Car Trim GmbH v. Key Safety Systems, §1.4 n. 63.

Electrosteel Europe SA v. Edel Centro SpA, §1.4 n. 63.

Handelskwekerij Bier v. Mines de Potasse d’Alsace, 1976, §2.8 n. 140.

Egypt

Court of Cassation, 23 June 2020, §4.9 n. 149.

Finland

Court of Appeal, Helsinki, 30 June 1998, §4.9 n. 167. Court of Appeal, Turku, 24 May 2005, §4.4 n. 40.

Court of Appeal, Turku, 18 December 2013, §4.9 n. 183.

France

Arbitral Awards by ICC Court of Arbitration (Paris): see ‘ICC Awards’ (below) Cour de Cassation, 4 January 1995, §3.3 n. 45; §3.8 n. 89 and 106.

Cour de Cassation, 17 December 1996, §4.4 n. 37; §4.7 n. 88.

Cour de Cassation, 27 January 1998, §3.7 n. 68.

Cour de Cassation, 16 July 1998, §3.8 n. 105 and n. 112.

Cour de Cassation, 26 May 1999, §4.9 n. 142 and 143; §6.8 n. 68.

Cour de Cassation, 19 March 2002, §4.11 n. 204.

Cour de Cassation, 2 April 2008, §8.5 n. 29.

Cour de cassation, 3 November 2009, §6.6 n. 48.

Cour de Cassation, 7 February 2012, §3.3 n. 38.

Cour de Cassation, 17 December 2013, §6.8 n. 91.

Cour de Cassation, 27 May 2014, §3.8 n. 104.

Cour de Cassation, 4 November 2014, §4.9 n. 142.

Cour de Cassation, 17 February 2015, §6.19 note 305.

Cour de Cassation, 18 April 2019, §2.5 n. 48.

Cour d’appel de Bordeaux, 12 September 2013, §4.09 n. 182.

Side 246

Cour d’appel de Bordeaux, France, 6 October 2020, §2.4 n. 26; §8.5 n. 29.

Cour d’appel de Bourges, 7 January 2016, §4.9 n. 125 and n. 180.

Cour d’appel de Bourges, France, 5 November 2020, §3.8 n. 112.

Cour d‘appel de Caen, France, 16 February 2021, §2.3 n. 15.

Cour d’appel de Chambéry, 25 May 1993, §2.9 n. 191.

Cour d‘appel de Colmar, 1 July 2020, §4.8 n. 104.

Cour d’appel de Colmar, 24 October 2000, §4.9 n. 142.

Cour d’appel de Colmar, 12 June 2001, §6.19 n. 295; §6.32 n. 421.

Cour d’appel de Grenoble, 22 February 1995, §2.10 n. 213; §6.11 n. 146; §6.23 n. 354.

Cour d’appel de Grenoble, 26 April 1995, §2.5 n. 53; §4.8 n. 105.

Cour d’appel de Grenoble, 13 September 1995, §4.8 n. 114.

Cour d’appel de Grenoble, 4 February 1999, §6.23 n. 357.

Cour d’appel de Lyon, 23 January 2000, §2.6 n. 93; §7.4 n. 59.

Cour d’appel de Paris, 4 June 2004, §6.8 n. 66.

Cour d’appel de Reims, 30 April 2013, §2.5 n. 49.

Cour d’appel de Rennes, 27 May 2008, §6.16 n. 232.

Cour d’appel de Rennes, France, 8 January 2019, §4.9 n. 179.

Cour d’appel de Rennes, France 23 October 2020, §2.5 n. 48.

Cour d’appel de Rouen, 3 October 2013, §3.8 n. 88; §6.15 n. 186; §7.2 n. 23.

Cour d’appel de Versailles, 29 January 1998, §4.9 n. 142; §6.8 n. 71.

Tribunal de Commerce de Besançon, 19 January 1998, §6.19 n. 283.

Tribunal de Commerce de Versailles, 12 March 2010, §6.23 n. 352.

Germany

Bundesgerichtshof, 15 February 1995, §6.11 n. 134.

Bundesgerichtshof, 8 March 1995, §4.7 n. 93.

Bundesgerichtshof, 3 April 1996, §6.8 n. 72.

Bundesgerichtshof, 25 June 1997, §4.9 n. 166; §6.17 n. 246.

Bundesgerichtshof, 23 July 1997, §2.5, n. 49.

Bundesgerichtshof, 25 November 1998, §2.12, n. 271; §4.9 n. 166.

Side 247

Bundesgerichtshof, 24 March 1999, §6.14 n. 174; §6.19 n. 280 and n. 283.

Bundesgerichtshof, 3 November 1999, §4.9 n. 146 and n. 173.

Bundesgerichtshof, 31 October 2001, §2.12 n. 277; §3.8 n. 90; §7.2 n. 18.

Bundesgerichtshof, 9 January 2002, §3.8 n. 114; §7.2 n. 23.

Bundesgerichtshof, 2 March 2005, §4.7 n. 91 and n. 93.

Bundesgerichtshof, 11 January 2006, §4.11 n. 199 and n. 208.

Bundesgerichtshof, 27 November 2007, §6.20 n. 337; §6.26 n. 373.

Bundesgerichtshof, 26 September 2012, §6.17 n. 251; §6.20 n. 334.

Bundesgerichtshof, 28 May 2014, §2.5 n. 52; §2.9 n. 195 & n. 197; §2.12 n. 279; §7.3 n. 37.

Bundesgerichtshof, 24 September 2014, §2.5 n. 56; §2.9 n. 191; §2.11 n. 234; §6.15 n. 197.

Bundesgerichtshof, 26 November 2020, §3.8 n. 90.

Amtsgericht Duisberg, 13 April 2000, §5.2 n. 10.

Amtsgericht Frankfurt, 31 January 1991, §6.11 n. 142; §6.26 n. 374.

Amtsgericht Kiel, 6 October 1995, §3.8 n. 112.

Amtsgericht München, 23 June 1995, §6.9 n. 117; §6.17 n. 246.

Amtsgericht Oldenburg/Holstein, 24 April 1990, §6.8 n. 90; §6.31 n. 408.

Landgericht Aachen, 20 July 1995, §6.31 n. 414.

Landgericht Aschaffenburg, 20 April 2006, §4.9 n. 161 and n. 163.

Landgericht Baden-Baden, 14 August 1991, §3.8 n. 107; §4.9 n. 176; §7.2 n. 16.

Landgericht Berlin, 15 September 1994, §6.11 n. 140.

Landgericht Darmstadt, 9 May 2000, §4.8 n. 115.

Landgericht Düsseldorf, 23 June 1994, §4.9 n. 177.

Landgericht Düsseldorf, 5 March 1996, §6.15 n. 208.

Landgericht Düsseldorf, 11 October 1995; §2.7 n. 122.

Landgericht Ellwangen, 21 August 1995, §4.7 n. 94; §6.8 n. 71.

Landgericht Frankfurt, 16 September 1991, §6.18 n. 256.

Landgericht Freiburg, 22 August 2002, §4.11 n. 197.

Landgericht Giessen, 5 July 1994, §7.2 n. 16.

Landgericht Hamburg, 26 September 1990, §2.12 n. 293.

Side 248

Landgericht Heidelberg, 3 July 1992, §6.8 n. 97; §6.31 n. 408.

Landgericht Landshut, 5 April 1995, §6.12 n. 149.

Landgericht München, 3 July 1989, §4.9 n. 172.

Landgericht München, 8 February 1995, §2.5 n. 65; §3.2 n. 21; §4.8 n. 112; §4.14 n. 244.

Landgericht München, 27 February 2002, §4.7 n. 90.

Landgericht Paderborn, 25 June 1996, §4.9 n. 169, 170.

Landgericht Stuttgart, 31 August 1989, §4.9 n. 160 and n. 175; §6.31 n. 410.

Landgericht Stuttgart, 13 August 1991, §7.3 n. 32.

Oberlandesgericht Celle, 24 May 1995, §6.10 n. 129.

Oberlandesgericht Celle, 24 July 2009, §3.8 n. 88.

Oberlandesgericht Dresden, 21 March 2007, §4.11 n. 208.

Oberlandesgericht Dresden, 8 November 2007, §4.9 n. 162.

Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf, 8 January 1993, §2.7 n. 123; §4.4 n. 28.

Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf, 2 July 1993, §2.6 n. 103; §2.11 n. 254.

Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf, 14 January 1994, §6.11 n. 134; §6.26 n. 376.

Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf, 4 July 2019, §6.19 n. 287.

Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt, 13 June 1991, §6.31 n. 410.

Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt, 17 September 1991, §2.5 n. 56; §6.8 n. 73.

Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt, 18 January 1994, §6.8 n. 68.

Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt, 23 May 1995; §3.8 n. 82.

Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt, 30 August 2000, §2.7 n. 119.

Oberlandesgericht Hamm, 22 September 1992, §3.8 n. 82.

Oberlandesgericht Hamm, 23 June 1998, §5.5 n. 43.

Oberlandesgericht Hamburg, 28 February 1997, §6.17 n. 243; §6.19 n. 286.

Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe, 20 November 1992, §5.2 n. 26.

Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe, 25 June 1997, §4.9 n. 166 and n. 176.

Oberlandesgericht Koblenz, 17 September 1993, §2.5 n. 49 and n. 60; §2.7 n. 122, §4.12 n. 215.

Oberlandesgericht Koblenz, 31 January 1997, §6.6 n. 44; §6.9 n. 118.

Oberlandesgericht Koblenz, 14 December 2006, §5.1 n. 7 and n. 60; §6.13 n. 156.

Side 249

Oberlandesgericht Köln, 22 February 1994; §3.7 n. 67.

Oberlandesgericht Köln, 26 August 1994, §2.5 n. 59.

Oberlandesgericht Köln, 21 May 1996, §4.8 n. 119; §6.15 n. 191.

Oberlandesgericht Köln, 24 May 2006, §3.8 n. 110

Oberlandesgericht Köln, 12 January 2007, §4.9 n. 162.

Oberlandesgericht München, 5 March 2008, §6.19 n. 285.

Oberlandesgericht München, 14 January 2009, §3.8 n. 89.

Oberlandesgericht Naumburg, 13 February 2013, §3.8 n. 88.

Oberlandesgericht Oldenburg, 5 December 2000, §4.9 n. 146.

Oberlandesgericht Saarbrücken, 3 June 1998, §4.9 n. 140.

Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart, 12 March 2001, §6.8 n. 103.

Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart, 31 March 2008, §4.9 n. 179.

Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart, 27 November 2019, §6.8 n. 92.

Oberlandesgericht Thüringen, 26 May 1998, §2.6 n. 103 and n. 109.

Schiedsgericht der Handelskammer – Hamburg, 21 March 1996, §6.19 n. 282 and n. 289.

Schiedsgericht der Handelskammer – Hamburg, 21 June 1996, §2.12 n. 274.

Hungary

Arbitration Court Hungarian Chamber of Commerce, 10 December 1996, §5.1 n. 6.

Metropolitan Court of Budapest, 24 March 1992, §3.2 n. 28; §8.8 n. 43.

Supreme Court of Hungary, 25 September 1992, §2.5 n. 45; §3.2 n. 26; §3.3 n. 35.

ICC Arbitral awards

ICC Case 7153/1992, §6.31 n. 411.

ICC Case 7197/1992, §4.12 n. 230; §5.5 n. 45; §6.19 n. 290; §6.21 n. 339; §6.32 n. 426; §7.4 n. 72.

ICC Case 6653/1993, §2.7 n. 117; §4.4 n. 31; §4.9 n. 128.

ICC Case 7565/1994, §2.7 n. 119.

ICC Case 7660/1994, §1.4 n. 70; §2.7 n. 117; §6.8 n. 97.

ICC Case 8128/1995, §6.16 n. 232; §6.19 n. 321.

ICC Case 8611/1997, §2.5 n. 49.

Side 250

ICC Case 9117/1998, §7.3 nn. 46–47.

ICC Case 9887/1999, §2.11 n. 261.

ICC Case 11849/2003, §2.5 n. 50; §6.25 n. 366.

Israel

Pamesa v. Mendelson, 17 March 2009, §2.6 n. 85; §2.9 n. 194; §4.6 n. 60, 61, 63, 65; §4.9 n. 179; §4.10 n. 190.

Italy

Corte di Cassazione, 28 June 2019, §1.4 n. 64.

Tribunale di Busto Arsizio, 13 December 2001, §6.8 n. 69.

Tribunale di Bolzano, Italy, 27 January 2009, §4.9 n. 142.

Tribunale di Foggia, 27 December 2021, §2.7 n. 114.

Tribunale di Forli, 16 February 2009, §2.3 n. 12; §4.9 n. 142.

Tribunale di Modena, 19 February 2014, §4.9 n. 183; §6.8 n. 48.

Tribunale di Reggio Emilia, 12 April 2011, §4.9 n. 142.

Tribunale di Trieste, 17 June 2019, §4.8 n. 106; §4.9 n. 127.

Korea

Commercial Arbitration Board, 8 August 2012, §6.12 n. 152.

Seoul Central District Court, 19 December 2008, §6.23 n. 351.

Seoul High Court, 14 October 2010, §6.23 n. 351.

Mexico

COMPRIMEX, award of 29 April 1996, §4.8 n. 114; §4.9 n. 122.

Netherlands

Netherlands Arbitration Institute, 15 October 2002, §2.11 n. 239; §4.7 n. 87 and n. 100; §6.11 n. 142; §6.26 n. 375.

Hoge Raad, 7 November 1997, §2.14 n. 301.

Hoge Raad, 20 February 1998, §4.9 n. 177.

Gerechtshof Arnhem, 24 August 1995, §2.6 n. 88.

Gerechtshof Arnhem, 9 March 2010, §4.9 n. 140.

Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden, 2 June 2020, §2.6, n. 101.

Gerechtshof Den Haag, Court of Appeal, The Hague, 22 April 2014, §2.9 n. 198; §3.8 n. 88.

Side 251

Gerechtshof Gravenhage, 23 April 2003, §4.7 n. 94.

Gerechtshof Hertogenbosch, 24 April 1996, §2.13 n. 293.

Gerechtshof Hertogenbosch, 15 December 1997, §4.9 n. 184.

Gerechtshof Leeuwarden, 31 August 2005, §2.5 n. 44.

Rechtbank Arnhem, 1 March 2006, §6.15 n. 194.

Rechtbank Arnhem, 29 July 2009, §6.26 n. 373.

Rechtbank Arnhem, 31 January 2008, §4.8 n. 221.

Rechtbank Arnhem, 11 February 2009, §4.9 n. 157.

Rechtbank Breda, 16 January 2009, §4.9 n. 135.

Rechtbank Hertogenbosch, 26 January 2011, §2.9 n. 186.

Rechtbank Limburg, 14 April 2021, §3.8 n. 92.

Rechtbank Middleburg, 2 April 2008, §2.5 n. 44.

Rechtbank Midden, 1 December 2021,§3.8 n. 92, 108.

Rechtbank Midden, 8 January 2020, §2.5 n. 44.

Rechtbank Midden, 25 March 2015, §2.5 nn. 63 & 70–71.

Rechtbank Midden, 16 November 2016, §3.8 n. 88, 95.

Rechtbank Noord-Holland, 06 October 2021, §2.5 n. 53.

Rechtbank Oost-Brabant, 28 February 2018, Ch. 1 n. 14; §2.12 n. 25.

Rechtbank Roermond, 19 December 1991, §4.9 n. 131 and n. 160.

Rechtbank Rotterdam, 8 December 2021, §4.9 n. 157.

Rechtbank Rotterdam, 3 November 2021, §2.7 n. 113; §3.8 n. 92.

Rechtbank Rotterdam, 11 December 2019, Ch. 1 n. 14; §2.7 n. 124; §3.8 n. 92; §7.4 n. 60.

Rechtbank Rotterdam, 25 February 2009, §3.8 n. 88.

Rechtbank Rotterdam, 12 July 2001, §8.8 n. 42.

Rechtbank Utrecht, 21 January 2009, §2.13 n. 291; §3.8 n. 88.

New Zealand

High Court, 30 July 2010, §2.9 n. 172.

Court of Appeal, 22 July 2011, §4.7 n. 95.

Side 252

Norway

Supreme Court, 6 February 2019, §2.9 n. 186; §6.26 n. 375. Agder Court of Appeal, 7 June 2013, §2.8 n. 147.

Poland

Supreme Court, 27 January 2006, §2.5 n. 49; §6.15 n. 196.

Supreme Court, 17 October 2008, §2.7 n. 122.

Supreme Court, 28 November 2013, §6.23 n. 355, 358.

Supreme Court, 25 June 2014, §9.1 n. 8.

Supreme Court of Poland, 22 October 2014, §4.3 n. 17; §5.2 n. 27.

Supreme Court, 16 October 2015, §9.2 n. 10.

Supreme Court, 2 June 2017, §4.7 n. 82, 83; §6.8 n. 98.

Białystok Court of Appeal, 25 January 2017, §2.14 n. 295.

Białystok Court of Appeal, 30 May 2018, §4.9 n. 138.

Poznan Court of Appeal, 3 March 2016, §6.8 n. 98.

Szczecin Court of Appeal, 7 February 2013, §4.7 n. 94; §6.8 n. 67.

Russian Federation

International Court of Commercial Arbitration at Chamber of Commerce, 24 January 2000, §2.7 n. 121; §4.9 n. 138; §6.17 n. 244.

International Court of Commercial Arbitration at Chamber of Commerce, 6 June 2000, §6.15 n. 210.

International Court of Commercial Arbitration at Chamber of Commerce, 13 May 2008, §6.18 n. 257.

International Court of Commercial Arbitration at Chamber of Commerce, 3 December 2014, §6.10 n. 129.

Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation, 2 November 2010, §3.2 n. 24.

Serbia

Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration of the Serbian Chamber of Commerce, 28 January 2009, §2.5 n. 49; §2.9 n. 172.

Slovenia

Higher Court Ljubljana, 9 April 2008, §3.6 n. 54.

District Court Ljubljana, 26 February 2016, §2.9 n. 192; §6.15 n. 230.

Side 253

Spain

Tribunal Supremo, 9 July 2014, §4.9 n. 183; §6.19 n. 284.

Tribunal Supremo, 6 July 2020, §2.5 n. 53; §4.9 n. 152.

Audencia Provincial, Barcelona, 13 May 2014, §2.13 n. 293.

Audencia Provincial, Madrid, 14 July 2009, §4.9 n. 152.

Audencia Provincial, Madrid, 17 February 2015, §9.1 n. 5.

Audencia Provincial, Valladolid, 6 April 2015, §6.19 n. 281 and 284.

Badalona Court of First Instance, 22 May 2006, §6.11 n. 136; §6.26 n. 376.

Fuenlabrada Court of First Instance, 11 May 2012, §4.7 n. 89.

Zaragoza Provincial High Court, 27 May 2014, §4.9 n. 177.

Sweden

Arbitration Institute, Stockholm Chamber of Commerce, award of 5 June 1998, §4.2 n. 14; §4.7 n. 87; §4.9 n. 158; §7.3 n. 41.

Switzerland

Appellationsgericht Basel-Stadt, 22 August 2003, §6.9 n. 104.

Bezirksgericht der Saane, 20 February 1997, §2.3 n. 21.

Bundesgericht, 28 October 1998, §6.8 n. 72; §6.15 n. 192.

Bundesgericht, 15 September 2000, §6.8 n. 87.

Bundesgericht, 22 December 2000, §2.12 n. 268; §4.4 n. 39.

Bundesgericht, 16 December 2008, §5.2 n. 13.

Bundesgericht, 18 May 2009, §6.8 n. 68.

Bundesgericht, 17 December 2009, §6.15 n. 210; §6.17 n. 244.

Bundesgericht, 8 November 2016, §2.5 n. 42.

Bundesgericht, 28 May 2019, §2.6 n. 92.

Cantonal Court of Valais, 27 April 2007, §3.3 n. 37.

Cour de Justice Genève, 10 October 1997, §4.10 n. 196.

Cour d’appel civile du Tribunal Cantonal de Vaud, 29 February 2016, §3.3 n. 46; §4.9 n. 150; §4.13 n. 239.

Handelsgericht Aargau, 5 November 2002, §6.8 n. 85.

Handelsgericht St. Gallen, 24 August 1995, §2.6 n. 89; §2.12 n. 286.

Handelsgericht St. Gallen, 5 December 1995, §4.13 n. 240.

Side 254

Handelsgericht Zürich, 26 April 1995, §2.5 n. 53; §2.6 n. 103.

Handelsgericht Zürich, 5 February 1997, §6.11 n. 147; §6.15 n. 201 and n. 208.

Kantonsgericht Schaffhausen, 27 Jan. 2004, §4.9 n. 161.

Kantonsgericht Zug, 12 December 2002, §6.8 n. 89.

Kantonsgericht Valais, 21 February 2005, §6.8 n. 65.

Pretura di Locarno Campagna, 27 April 1992, §4.7 n. 92; §6.9 n. 119; §6.13 n. 159.

Tribunal Cantonal Valais, 28 October 1997, §4.8 n. 117.

Tribunal Cantonal Valais, 27 April 2007, §4.12 n. 216.

Tribunale di appello di Lugano, 15 January 1998, §4.9 n. 129; §4.12 n. 228; §5.2 n. 16 and n. 19; §6.12 n. 148.

Tribunale d’appello del Ticino, 20 April 2016, §6.25 n. 369. Obergericht Kanton Luzern, 8 January 1997, §4.9 n. 146.

Zivilgericht Basel, 1 March 2002, §4.5 n. 48.

Ukraine

Int’l Commercial Arbitration Court at Chamber of Commerce, Award No. 48, 2005, §6.17 n. 244.

Int’l Commercial Arbitration Court at Chamber of Commerce, 23 January 2012, §2.7 n. 122; §6.19 n. 275.

United States of America

AGB Contemporary A.G. v. Artemundi LLC, §3.11 n. 145.

Ajax Tool Works, Inc. v. Can-Eng Manufacturing Ltd, §2.7 n. 120, §7.3 n. 42 and n. 51; §7.4 n. 67.

American Mint LLC v. GoSoftware, Inc., §2.5 n. 63.

America’s Collectibles Network, Inc. v. Timlly et al., §8.5 n. 29.

Amit Israeli v. Dott. Gallina S.r.l., Dario Gallina and David Galina, §7.1 n. 10; §72 n. 15; §7.4 n. 70.

Asante Technologies, Inc. v. PMC Sierra, Inc., §2.3, n. 14 and n. 20; §2.7 n. 122; §4.6 n. 67.

Barbara Berry, S.A. de C.V. v. Ken M. Spooner Farms, Inc., §7.4 n. 62.

Beijing Metals v. American Business Center, §4.5 n. 43 and n. 46.

BP Oil International v. Empresa Estatal Petroleos de Ecuador, §2.3 n. 15; §2.13 n. 243; §4.3 n. 17; §5.2 n. 21.

Side 255

Bunnett v. Smallwood, §6.15 n. 219.

Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, §4.12 n. 219.

Calzaturificio Claudia s.n.c. v. Olivieri Footwear Ltd., §2.13 n. 289.

Cedar Petrochemicals Inc. v. Dongbu Hannong Chemical Ltd, §2.9 n. 197; §4.5 n. 46, §4.9 n. 121; §7.3 n. 47.

Chateau des Charmes Wines Ltd. v. Sabate USA, Sabate S.A., §3.8 n. 81, n. 105, n. 117 and n. 121.

Chicago Prime Packers, Inc. v. Northam Food Trading Co., §4.9 n. 144.

CNA International, Inc. v. Guangdong Kelon Electronical Holdings et al., §8.5 n. 29.

CSS Antenna, Inc. v. Amphenol-Tuchel Electronics, GMBH, §3.8 n. 88.

Delchi Carrier, SpA v. Rotorex Corp., §2.3 n. 6; §6.15 n. 183, n. 190, n. 202, and n. 205; §6.18 n. 263.

Dingxi Longhai Dairy, Ltd. v. Becwood Technology Group L.L.C., §2.8 n. 142.

Doolim Corp. v. R Doll, §6.26 n. 373 & n. 377.

Eastern Concrete Materials, Inc. v. Jamer Materials Limited, U.S.D.C., §4.6 n. 56.

ECEM European Chemical Marketing B.V. v. The Purolite Co, §4.5 n. 46.

Electrocraft Arkansas, Inc. v. Electric Motors, Ltd et al., §4.6 n. 67; §8.4 n. 29. Evra v. Swiss Bank Corp., §6.15 n. 228.

FPM Financial Services, LLC v. Redline Products, §2.4 n. 28; §8.8 n. 37.

Forestal Guarani S.A. v. Daros International, Inc., §2.14 n. 229 and n. 301; §8.8 n. 44.

Geneva Pharmaceuticals Technology Corp. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., §2.6 n. 82; §3.2 n. 23; §3.7 n. 75.

Golden Valley Grape Juice and Wine, LLC v. Centriys Corporation / Centriys Corporation v. Separator Technology Solutions Pty Ltd., §3.8 n. 89; §3.11 n. 144.

Hanwha Corporation v. Cedar Petrochemicals, Inc., §3.8 n. 112.

Hellenic Petroleum LLC v. Elbow River Marketing Ltd., §3.10 n. 138.

Hefei Ziking Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. v. Meever & Meever et al., §2.8 n. 142; §6.28 n. 385.

Innotex Precision Limited v. Horei, Inc., et al., §8.5 n. 29.

Side 256

It’s Intoxicating, Inc., v. Maritim Hotelgesellschaft GmbH and D. Zimmer, §2.7 n. 122.

Korea Trade Insurance Corporation v. Oved Apparel Corporation, §4.5 n. 46.

Magellan International Corporation v. Salzgitter Handel GmbH, §6.4 n. 28; §6.5 n. 36.

MCC-Marble Ceramic Center Inc. v. Ceramica Nuova D’Agostino S.p.A., §2.12 n. 282; §4.5 n. 46; §7.3 n. 47.

Medical Marketing Int.l Inc. v. Internazionale Medico Scientifica, S.r.l., §2.5 n. 49; §4.7 n. 94.

Miami Valley Paper, LLC v. Lebbing Engineering & Consulting GmbH, §4.6 n. 56 and 57.

Minh Dung Aluminum Company, Ltd v. Aluminum Alloys MFG LLC, §6.15 n. 206 and n. 224.

Mitchell Aircraft Spares Inc. v. European Aircraft Service AB, §4.5 n. 46.

New York State Dept. of Health v. Rusi Technology Co., Ltd., §2.12 n. 275.

Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Power Source Supply, Inc., §7.4 n. 56.

Parsons and Whittemore Overseas Co. Inc. v. RAKTA, §7.3 n. 54.

Perkins Manufacturing Comp. v. Haul-All Equipment Ltd., §4.6 n. 64.

Princesse D’Isenbourg et CIE Ltd. v. Kinder Caviar, Inc. and Kinder Caviar, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc., §2.4 n. 28.

Prime Start Ltd. v. Maher Forest Products Ltd., §2.4 n. 28.

Roser Technologies v. Carl Schreiber GmbH, §2.7 n. 122; §3.8 n. 88.

San Lucio, S.r.l. et al. v. Import & Storage Services, LLC et al., §6.18 n. 263.

Schmitz-Werke GmbH and Co. v. Rockland Industries Inc., §4.8 n. 109; §4.9 n. 128.

Sky Cast, Inc. v. Global Direct Distribution, LLC, §4.6 n. 62.

Shuttle Packaging Systems LLC v. Tsonakis, §4.9 n. 145; §6.8 n. 63; §6.23 n. 350.

Softman Products Co., LCC v. Adobe Systems Inc., §2.5 n. 70.

Stawski Distributing Co., Inc. v. Zywiec Breweries PLC, §6.8 n. 113.

St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co. et al. v. Neuromed Medical Systems and Support, et al., §2.7 n. 117; §5.2 n. 22.

Stemcor USA, Inc. v. Miracero, A.A. de C.V., §6.15 n. 224.

Sunrise Foods International Inc. v. Ryan Hinton Inc., §6.28 nn. 392 and 395.

Side 257

S.V. Braun, Inc. v. Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane, S.p.A, §6.13, n. 153.

Styles v. Movie Star Muscle Cars, Inc. et al., §6.6 n. 39.

Target Corp. v. JJS Developments LTD, §2.2 n. 1.

Topp Paper Company v. ETI Converting Equip., §6.16 n. 239.

TeeVee Tunes, Inc. et al. v. Gerhard Schubert GmbH, §6.15 n. 195; §7.3 n. 48.

Travelers Property Casualty Company of America et al. v. Saint-Gobain Technical Fabrics Canada Limited, §2.7 n. 118.

Usinor Industeel v. Leeco Steel Products, Inc., §2.6 n. 101; §6.25 n. 369.

Volkswagenwerk A.G. v. Schlunk, §2.8 n. 156.

Zapata Hermanos Sucesores, S.A. v. Hearthside Baking Co., Inc., etc., §2.8 n. 149; §6.15 n. 223; §6.28 n. 387.

Side 258

  • Luk
  • Udvid

Understanding the CISG (6th Ed.)

A Compact Guide to the 1980 United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods